<<<<<<< Back to Improv Review

 

CIF 2001 Supplement

Main Page

Reviews

3 Guys Named Joe

Annoyance Theater

Baby Wants Candy

Beer Shark Mice

Boom Chicago

Carl & the Passions

Chicago Comedysportz

Dinner for Six

Feature, Feature

Free Associates

Georgia Pacific

Improv 'Til Dawn

LA Theatresports

Land of the Karaoking Improvisors

Liquid Radio Players

Mission Improvable

On the Spot

People of Earth

Postmortem

SAK Theater

Second City Alumni

Silent Movie

Sin City

Sirens

Slap Happy

Slotnick, Katz & Lehr

Solo Showcase

The Swarm

Upright Citizen's Brigade's ASSSCAT

Waterbrains

Weaseliscious

WeirDass

Whose Chorus Line Is It Anyway?

Whose Line Is It Anyway?

Yellow Man Group

 

Slipping Through Their Fingers

Waterbrains (Los Angeles)

Review by William McEvoy

The Waterbrains may be a troupe of solid players.  They may know how to portray a story well.  They may be funny.  Unfortunately, deference to an artificial format, they let their structure get in the way of presenting a good show, canceling all their seemingly good efforts.  Coupled with suggestion requests that restrict the storylines, the Waterbrains defeat themselves before they even start their first scene.

Since it’s the format I take such issue with, let’s explore it.  On the surface, it seems innocuous enough: Get a suggestion of a small town, and a holiday, explore that.  Get a suggestion of a big town, and a profession, explore that.  In the third act, put them together.  The problem I see with this format is that rather than starting from a restricted place and letting the play grow out of that restriction, the piece starts from a relatively unrestricted place and grows more restrictive.  (Imagine a cone shape, if you will.  Start from the small end, and you can go anywhere.  Start from the wide end, and the conclusion is foregone.)  Since in a good play, the characters' choices become more limited as a result of their own decisions, to throw this artificial restriction on the story only stifles.  In this piece, they are forced to develop these small town and big town stories, and then someone has to have a reason to get on a bus and go to the other place, creating, in the last third of the play, a whole new set of connections while at the same time attempting to wrap up both stories.

So how did this play out with the Waterbrains?  The first story took place in Podunk on Cinco de Mayo.  We are first introduced to a drunken trailer trash couple.  She can’t get off the floor, and through her mumblings we realize this was a one-night stand, a regular occurrence.  We then meet the only Mexicans in Podunk, who naturally own Podunk’s only Mexican restaurant.  Finally, we’re introduced to Billy Joe, whose father wants him to be more manly and tough.  Except for the fact that the drunks apparently got loaded at the Mexican restaurant, there is no connection made between the three.  Ultimately, in the third act, only Billy Joe is going to continue his story, the other stories being completely dropped.  When we switch to the big city.  We’re at a NY hairdresser, which inexplicably is run by Soprano-like mobsters who are having a war with the Egyptian mob (who all have Indian accents).  A Romeo and Juliet story develops between an Egyptian girl and her Italian beau, which never resolves.

I have to stop now.  Each of these pieces is so riddled with faults and holes that there was no way it could have come together effectively.  I had to sit through the ending, there’s no reason you have to. 

    

<<<<<<< Back to Improv Review

   What did they just write about my favorite improv group? editor@improvreview.com